Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Amendments Require Best Practices to Properly Preserve and Access Electronic Content
ZANTAZ Outlines Amendments, Their Impact on Archiving Electronic Content, and How Best to Prepare for the FRCP Changes to Ensure Effective Discovery Processes
PLEASANTON, Calif. - Sept. 21, 2006 - ZANTAZ, Inc., a global leader in content archiving and electronic discovery solutions, has developed a set of best practices for responding to the imminent, complex changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) regarding electronic discovery. The changes, which have been generally recognized for some time, become official on December 1, 2006. Companies adopting these best practices can minimize the cost of the electronic discovery process and ensure effective litigation in the Federal Court System. The best practices are being distributed free of charge in the form of a white paper authored by Russ Yoshinaka, Esq., senior director of Legal Affairs at ZANTAZ. The white paper is available for download at the ZANTAZ website: http://www.zantaz.com/news/resources/white_papers_list.php.
In addition to the best practices, the white paper also includes extensive information on the FRCP changes and how the changes will impact corporate policies pertaining to electronic discovery and the archiving of electronic content.
"The changes to the FRCP put additional pressure on organizations to develop systems and processes that make them more accountable for preserving and producing data for electronic discovery requests," said Steve King, president and CEO, ZANTAZ. "Through years of experience developing and refining the electronic discovery process, ZANTAZ has crafted key best practices that will help companies maintain control over the information they have, the information they should delete, and how to access the information they need to respond to litigation."
For all U.S.-based organizations and some multi-nationals operating in the U.S., these rule changes, which for the first time specifically reference electronically stored information including email as evidence, will have a dramatic effect on the amount of time and money spent preparing for litigation. Failure to be prepared for these changes can result in higher costs for "rush" discovery requests and present a greater likelihood of lost lawsuits.
"Corporations can minimize the risks of high discovery costs and discovery sanctions by following ZANTAZ' best practices for effectively collecting, preserving, and accessing electronic content relevant to litigation," Yoshinaka said. "As a result of implementing these best practices, ZANTAZ customers have successfully integrated content archiving and electronic discovery processes that enable them to address the concepts embodied within the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure."
Briefly summarized, the ZANTAZ best practices for electronic discovery preparation are:
Establish routine, good faith data deletion. FRCP changes give companies a limited so-called "Safe Harbor" upon which to formulate a data deletion process. However, the process must first be "routine." This is most readily accomplished by an electronic data archiving system that can be configured so as to allow for regularly scheduled, systematic deletions of data based on parameters suitable to the customer's internal policies or external requirements. In addition, all data deletion must be done in "good-faith." This means that the routine process must include the ability to tag and preserve data that is subject to potential litigation, which again is most readily accomplished by an electronic data archiving system.
Know what data you have and in which format it exists. FRCP changes provide a mechanism by which a party to a lawsuit can claim that it need not search certain sources of information due to an undue burden or cost. But to take advantage of this rule, the party must be able to identify these sources and have enough information regarding the nature and content of these sources in order to defend its argument.
Address the most important content first. According to the Enterprise Strategy Group (ESG), email represents a staggering 75 percent of all corporate intelligence, and in 2005, according to Corporate Counsel Magazine, U.S. organizations spent a total of $5.8 billion to analyze emails for discovery purposes. Several million-dollar fines have been levied against corporations in the last few years for failure to capture, preserve, and produce email. Email should be among the first types of content companies properly capture and preserve.
Outsource the archive process to a trusted third party. With the December 1st deadline rapidly approaching, companies need to act now. With a hosted, or "on demand," archiving solution, companies can rely on an experienced partner to get their electronic information organized, accessible, and ready for discovery in a matter of days or weeks - not months or years.
Ensure that policies established for data deletion are integrated with the archive, and that both the policy and the system allow for "legal holds." While the rule changes require companies to integrate data deletion into the archiving system, companies should ensure the flexibility to initiate "legal holds" to prevent automatically deleting information relevant to pending litigation.
Keep all electronic data with a single vendor to manage risk and limit costs. The FRCP changes add even greater complexity to already complex information management processes. Relying on a single, trusted partner that provides a complete offering of content archiving and electronic discovery solutions can reduce complexity, help manage costs by centralizing all project management duties and data-processing tasks, and reduce the risk of tainting the "chain-of-custody."
For the complete white paper, which includes more detailed information about the FRCP amendments and how to implement these best practices, please visit the ZANTAZ website at http://www.zantaz.com/news/resources/white_papers_list.php.
About ZANTAZ
ZANTAZ is the global leader in Information Retention and Discovery Management (IRDM) solutions. ZANTAZ archiving and litigation support solutions enable organizations to capture, preserve and access unstructured digital information-including email, IM, files, scanned documents, and other electronic records-and review and produce relevant documents in a manner that reduces operational risks and costs while complying with legal, regulatory and corporate policy requirements. ZANTAZ solutions are available as on-site software applications or on-demand hosted services, and include a broad set of professional services and integration support. ZANTAZ customers include 9 of the 10 top global law firms, 11 of the Fortune 25 and 14 of the top 20 Financial Securities firms. For more information, visit www.ZANTAZ.com or call 800.636.0095.
Summary: ...Find a solution that facilitated all capabilities via a single platform • Address all stages of eDiscovery in a legally defensible manner, in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) • Adhere to budgetary and deployment requirements The Solution Seamless End-to-end eDiscovery The...
Summary: ...such as misfiling, loss, and accidental deletion. Emails are stored with their attachments alongside related matter content, ensuring that they retain their full context and meaning, and are readily available in the event of e-discovery. WorkSite also helps the firm preserve client confidentiality by...
Summary: ...dealing with the retention and deletion of data. These requirements make it nearly impossible to effectively manage these intricate requests using manual methods. With the HP Autonomy solution, compliance tasks can be handled automatically in accordance with rules set by the compliance officer. The automated...
Summary: ...Some document important business decisions or policies. Some document the company’s regulatory compliance. Some establish business-critical processes and procedures. As the years pass, these records accumulate, and as they accumulate, the cost of storing them mounts. To keep their records manageable,...
Summary: ...processes at First Interstate Bank are now provided in a web-based eforms library accessible to 49 branch locations. Uniformity and business and routing rules built into the eforms ensure accuracy and efficiencies throughout the account processing lifecycle. 2 Case study | First Interstate Bank The challenge...
Summary: ...were a key result of the WorkSite-centric workflow automation • The firm eliminated the step of always opening a paper file at the start of a matter—a result of the paper-to-digital transition via WorkSite • New, tighter rules and procedures regarding email management are now in place, contributing...
Summary: ...the HP TRIM SaaS solution. The new system has shortened the amount of time it takes to fulfill public records requests. Previously, the process required pulling backup tapes, emails, and file servers to satisfy requests for information.
...
Summary: ...creation of a structured electronic matter file Gallagher Sharp is a trial and business practice frm focused on the defense of civil claims and lawsuits for corporations, insurance companies and their policyholders. The frm’s areas of experience include general litigation, business and employment, insurance,...
Summary: ...OSPA determined that an electronic, Webbased internal proposal data form was the single most important process improvement it could implement. Streamlining the grant application approval process would increase the time that could be spent on developing more competitive proposals. Working with HP Autonomy,...
Summary: ...Frost Brown Todd LLC. From a risk management perspective, the firm also needed a better way to identify and locate documents in its possession—as a client lawsuit made dramatically clear. “One of our clients was being sued, and we had to hold everything in the entire firm related to them,” says...
Summary: ...WorkSite is that it makes you really think through what you do and how. Along the way, you come up with better ways of doing things.” Reducing Risk and Aiding Compliance In the past, Moore Stephens Sydney Pty Limited lacked an efficient way to preserve and manage electronic records. With no capabilities...
Summary: ...capacity. Challenges • Reduce the storage capacity taken up by an estimated 4 TB of personal archiving files (PST) • Reduce time and cost of backup and recovery tasks • Ensure future compliance with OFGEM regulations regarding the supply and sales of energy • Minimize impact on users The Solution...
This is a small selection of the Autonomy case studies available, please visit our publications site at http://publications.autonomy.com/ for more information.
Summary: ...and cost management. Autonomy Legal Hold provides the systemized, repeatable, and defensible process necessary to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) and case law. Each step of the process is consistently executed on a single, easy-to-use, highly scalable and secure platform that quickly...
Summary: ...that begins when litigation or an investigation is reasonably anticipated. Meeting the preservation obligation is an ever-increasing priority because failure to preserve and produce ESI can have severe consequences under the amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), such as evidentiary sanctions,...
Summary: ...visibility into the review process, and cost management—all in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP). Solution highlights • A complete, modular legal hold solution • FRCP compliant process • Preserve data In-place • Forensically sound collections • The most data sources...
Summary: ...archives, records and document management systems, and employees’ laptops. In addition, ALH tracks data throughout the litigation lifecycle to provide a complete audit trail, visibility into the review process, and cost management—all in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP)....
Summary: ...Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) and case law. Each step of the process is consistently executed on a single, easy-to-use, highly scalable and secure platform that quickly implements the workflow and processes necessary to demonstrate reasonable and good faith efforts to comply with the duty to...
Summary: ...Legal Hold provides the systemized, repeatable, and defensible process necessary to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) and case law. Each step of the process is consistently executed on a single, easy-to-use, highly scalable and secure platform that quickly implements the workflow...
Summary: ...Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) and case law. Each step of the process is consistently executed on a single, easy-to-use, highly scalable and secure platform that quickly implements the workflow and processes necessary to demonstrate reasonable and good faith efforts to comply with the duty to...
Summary: ...with the shift in communication paradigms and the explosion of electronic content is a legal challenge addressed, in part, by the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) in December 2006. Since then, the courts have begun the process of expanding the form and format of electronic content...
Summary: ...20 years. Some of the regulations organizations should be aware of include: • Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) – Amended December 2006 • UK Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Part 31 – Effective April 26, 1999; Amended October, 2005 • Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) – Effective 2002 • Financial...
Summary: ...governance concerns have moved this technology to a strategic position in the enterprise. Governance and information risk issues came sharply into focus with the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP). As the uses of archiving evolve from managing mailbox volumes to addressing enterprise-wide...
Summary: ...confusion and, worse, litigation woes resulting from compliance violations. Its basic ad-hoc nature does little to address the complex requirements of such regulations as Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) and amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), nor does it meet the need for efficient, fast and...
Summary: ...of ESI Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) in the United States, the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) in the United Kingdom, and under the civil procedure rules across Canada, Social Media Sites (SMS) are considered documents and electronically stored information (ESI): information on SMS is...
This is a small selection of the Autonomy Product Briefs available, please visit our publications site at http://publications.autonomy.com/ for more information.
Summary: ...electronic data is effectively collected, preserved, and ready for the discovery process. Executive Summary 3 www.ZANTAZ.com The amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) are directives proposed by a committee to update the FRCP, and have been approved by the Supreme Court. These rules...
Summary: ...the Author 9 Autonomy ZANTAZ FRCP 37(f): What the Heck is Good Faith? 1 Introduction On December 1, 2006, a number of amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the “FRCP Amendments”) are expected to become law. One of the more significant amendments creates a new “Safe Harbor” provision...
Summary: ...priority because failure to preserve and produce ESI can have severe consequences under the amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) and case law. The penalties for failure to preserve potentially relevant ESI have included evidentiary sanctions, adverse rulings, and fines, not to mention negative...
Summary: ...Advisory Committee Note to the 2006 Amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 37(e). Moreover, “[a]mong the factors that bear on a party’s good faith in the routine operation of an information system are the steps the party took to comply with a * * * party agreement requiring preservation...
Summary: ...litigation requirements now represent a significant driver towards improved information governance practices in many organizations. The amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) of 200646 codified prior rules and case law to clearly establish that electronically stored information (ESI)...
Summary: ...investigation reaches its ultimate resolution. Compounding this challenge, the explosion of electronic data, and amendments to the US Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), has introduced aggressive timeframes into the electronic discovery process. Adding complexity to the ability to preserve information...
Summary: ...Transforming Matter and Case Management with a Platform of Meaning. Litigators are subject to stringent rules for managing electronic content, as outlined in the 2006 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP). The duty to preserve potentially relevant information begins when litigation...
Summary: ...Strange Bedfellows? Keyword and Conceptual Search Unite to Make Sense of Relevant ESI in Electronic Discovery - Autonomy Whitepaper. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) (2006) Amendments to the discovery rules demand an exhaustive search for and identification of sources of discoverable electronically...
Summary: ...agreement of the parties). 11 Cf. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e), which provides: “Absent exceptional circumstances, a court may not impose sanctions under these rules on a party for failing to provide electronically stored information lost as a result of the routine, good faith operation of...
Summary: ...millions of documents for enterprise search, there is an acute need for an infrastructure solution that enables repeatable business processes. 1 Recent changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) require that all Electronically Stored Information (ESI) relevant to a case, regardless of data...
Summary: ...or an investigation is reasonably anticipated is a pressing concern for legal and IT professionals. It is an ever-increasing priority because failure to preserve and produce ESI has severe consequences under the amended FRCP. As part of a defensible process, the organization must be able to issue, manage,...
Summary: ...recent financial crisis. Government organizations from around the world have been tightening regulations around archiving, storing, and retaining historical business information for compliance. For instance, amendments made to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) in 2006 stipulate that all digital...
This is a small selection of the Autonomy White Papers available, please visit our publications site at http://publications.autonomy.com/ for more information.
Related Case Studies
Find us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
See us on YouTube
Find us on LinkedIn
